Sunday, January 26, 2020

Substitution reaction

Substitution reaction Introduction Substitution reaction of chemistry substitution reaction are also called displacement reactions .These are the reactions in which an atom or a group of atoms attached to a carbon atom in a molecule is replaced by some other atom or group of atoms without any change in the structure of the remaining part of the molecule. The product formed is known as the substitution product. The new atom or group which enters the molecule is called the substituent. Some example of substitution reactions are: CHâ‚„+clâ‚‚ → CHâ‚Æ'cl+Hcl Methane Methyl chloride Here H-atom of CHâ‚„ is replaced by chloride atom. CHâ‚Æ'-CHâ‚‚Br+KOH (aq) → CHâ‚Æ'CHâ‚‚OH+KBr Ethyl bromide Ethyl alcohol Here Br atom of ethyl bromide is replaced by OH group. CHâ‚Æ' -CHâ‚‚ = CHâ‚‚ → ClCHâ‚‚ -CH=CHâ‚‚ + Hcl Propene Allyl chloride Here H-atom of CHâ‚Æ' group is replaced by cl-atom Types of substitution reaction Depending upon the nature of attacking reagent, substitution reactions can be classified as below: a) Electrophilic Substitution Reactions : These are the reactions in which an atom or group in a molecule is replaced by an electrophile. Such reactions are shown by aromatic compound. CHâ‚…+HONO₂→ CHâ‚…NOâ‚‚+H â‚‚0 CHâ‚…+ NO₂→CHâ‚… NOâ‚‚+H â‚‚0 (H â‚‚s0 â‚„) Here Nitronium ion (NOâ‚‚ ions )acts as an electrophile and the process is called nitration. Mechanism. Consider the chlorination of benzene in presence of halogen carrier(Feclâ‚Æ') Feclâ‚Æ'+cl-cl → Fecl₄⠁ »+cl(chloronium ion) Electrophiles are involved in electrophilic substitution reactions and particularly in electrophilic aromatic substitutions: Electrophilic reactions to other unsaturated compounds than arenes generally lead to electrophilic addition rather than substitution. B) Necleophilic Substitution Reactions:- These are the reaction sin which an atom or a group in a molecule is replaced by a nuclophile. Such reactions are shown by alkyl halides. Consider the action of aqueous KOH on methyl chloride. HO⠁ »+H -CHâ‚Æ' Cl→ Ho-cHâ‚Æ'OH+cl⠁ » A nucleophile (literally nucleus lover) is a molecule or ion capable of acting as a Lewis base (i.e., an electron pair donor). Nucleophiles can be described as electron-rich while their targets or substrates can be described as electron-deficient (they are Lewis acids, i.e., electron pair acceptors). In a nucleophilic substitution the nucleophile takes the place ofor substitutes forsome atom or group on the substrate (called the leaving group): Nu: + R:L → R:Nu+ + :L- nucleophile substrate product leaving group If the nucleophile is neutral (as shown above) the product will be charged since the leaving group takes both bonding electrons away with it. If the nucleophile is an anion then the product will be neutral: Nu: + R:L → R:Nu + :L- Stronger bases make better nucleophiles (e.g., OH- is a better nucleophile than H2O). Good substrates include cations, central atoms with incomplete octets or double bonds (like sp2 carbons) or carbons with partial positive charges. Halogens are generally more electronegative than carbon and so organohalogen compounds are usually subject to nucleophilic attack at the carbon attached to the halogen (which would be the positive end of a dipole). For example, 2-chloro-2-methylpropane (commonly known as t-butyl chloride) will undergo nucleophilic substitution with hydroxide ion: (CH3)3CCl + OH → (CH3)3COH + Cl This is a typical synthetic route for producing an alcohol from an alkyl halide. Nucleophilic substitution reactions have been studied for many years. It was noticed fairly early that while the overall reaction was similar in the vast majority of cases the kinetics of the process was not always the same. In some substitutions the concentration of the nucleophile had no effect on the rate. In others, the rate was directly proportional to the concentration of the nucleophile. This suggested that two different mechanisms must be at work. The factor which determines the mechanism employed is typically the nature of the substrate itself and NOT the particular nucleophile. Necleophilic substitution reactions are further classified as:- 1)Necleophilic substitution Biomolecular :- Such reaction sare shown by primary alkyl halides and involve a single step. The breaking of C-X bond and the making of C-OH bond takes place simultaneously. The neucleophile approaches the C-atom from the side opposite to that carrying the halogen. In such reactions, an inverted product is formed. The reaction involves the formation of a transition state. The reaction follows the rate law, Rate=k[Alkyl halide][OH]. As the slow rate determining step involves two molecule(Alkyl halide and alkali); therefore, the reaction is known as bimolecular substitution reaction. Most necleophilic substitutions, which involve the expulsion of an originally neutral substituent ,notably of halogen, from the aromatic ring,at temperature which are not particularly high,use the biomolecular mechanism SN2. This is established by their second order kinetics, which are documented by many records, (NOâ‚‚)â‚‚CHâ‚Æ'†¢Cl+OEt⠁ »Ã¢â€ â€™(NOâ‚‚)â‚‚CHâ‚Æ'†¢OEt+Cl⠁ » In substitution of this type,the rate of attack by different reagent on the same aromatic molecules follow the general order of nucleophilic strength towards carbon. This is the conclusion to which Bunnatt and Zahler come after having assembled data from many sources. The first mechanism is known as SN1 (substitution, nucleophilic, unimolecular) because only one molecule is involved in the first stepthe rate determining step. Reactions occurring by this mechanism should exhibit first-order kinetics, i.e., the rate law should have the form rate = k[substrate]1. Because the nucleophile is not involved until after the slow step its concentration will have no effect on the rate. The alternate mechanism is called SN2 (substitution, nucleophilic, bimolecular) because two molecules are involved in the rate determining (and only) step. Such reactions exhibit overall second-order kinetics. The rate is proportional to both the concentration of the substrate and the concentration of the nucleophile. Reactions like this will have a rate law in the form rate = k[substrate] [nucleophile] 2) Nucleophilic Substitution Unimolecular:- This mechanism is generally followed by tertiary alkyl halide. In the first step, tertiary alkyl halie breaks hydrolytically to form intermediate carbonium ion. The formation of carbonium ion is the slow rate determing step. In the second step, the nucleophile attacks tha carbonium ion to form an alcohol. Consider the action of aqueous KOH or tertiary Butyl bromide. CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚Æ' ____ C-Br ⇄ CHâ‚Æ' C +Br⠁ » (Slow Step) CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚Æ' ____ C + OH⠁ » ⇄ CHâ‚Æ' C +OH (Fast Step) CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚Æ' (carbonium ion) Tert. butyl alcohol Or The best established eample of nucleophilic aromatic substitution by the unimolecular mechanism ,SN1,is the uncatalysed decomposition of diazoium ions,in hydroxylic solvent,to give phenols or phhenolic ethers,accomplished often byaryl halides or others such substitution products, if the necessary necleophilic anions are present in the solution: ArNâ‚‚+ → Ar+Nâ‚‚ (Slow) Ar+Hâ‚‚o →Ar†¢ OH+H (fast) Ar+ROH→Ar†¢OR+H (Fast) Ar +cl ⠁ »Ã¢â€ â€™ Ar†¢ Cl (Fast) These are SN1 mechanism . The alternate mechanism is called SN2 (substitution, nucleophilic, bimolecular) because two molecules are involved in the rate determining (and only) step. Such reactions exhibit overall second-order kinetics. The rate is proportional to both the concentration of the substrate and the concentration of the nucleophile. Reactions like this will have a rate law in the form rate = k[substrate] [nucleophile] 3) Free Radicals Subsitution Reactions[1.2.3] These are the reactions in which an atom or group of atoms in a molecule is replaced by a free radical. The replacement of H- atom by a halogen atom is an example of free radicals substitution.In the free radical substitution reaction, the attacking reagent is a free radicals. These reactions are carried either at high temperature or in the presence of ultra-violet light. In organic chemistry, a radical substitution reaction is a substitution reaction involving free radicals as a reactive intermediate The reaction always involves at least two steps, and possibly a third. In the first step called initiation (2,3) a free radical is created by photolysis. Homolysis can be brought about by heat or light but also by radical initiators such as organic peroxides or azo compounds. Light is used to create two free radicals from one diatomic species. The final step is called termination (6,7) in which the radical recombines with another radical species. If the reaction is not terminated, but instead the radical group(s) go on to react further, the steps where new radicals are formed and then react is collectively known as propagation (4,5) because a new radical is created available for secondary reactions. Mechanism. The mechanism of free radicals substitution involves three steps:- I) Initiation :- In this step, halogen molecule breaks homolyticallly to form free radicals. Consider the action of Brâ‚‚ on ethane in presence of sunlight. Br-Br Br II) Propagation step: The Br formed in the first step reacts with alkane molecule to form new free radicals which in turn reacts with bromine molecule and the chain react ion starts and so on. CHâ‚Æ'CHâ‚Æ'+Br →CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚‚+HBr CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚‚+Br -Br →CHâ‚Æ' CHâ‚‚Br+Br 3) Termination.: In this step, the free radicals combine and the reaction stops. Br + Br → Brâ‚‚ Similarly, consider action of Clâ‚‚ on propene. I) cl cl→ 2Cl II) CHâ‚‚=CH- CHâ‚Æ'+Cl→ CHâ‚‚=CH- CHâ‚‚+HCl CHâ‚‚=CH- CHâ‚‚+Cl-Cl→ CHâ‚‚=CH-CHâ‚‚Cl+Cl Substitution Reactions[1.2.3] Substitution Reactions. In an acid-base reaction such as CH3CO2H + NH3 → CH3CO2 + NH4+ the N acts as a nucleophile (Greek for â€Å"loving the nucleus), the H acts as an electrophile (â€Å"loves electrons†), and the O that accepts the pair of electrons acts as a leaving group. The acid-base reaction is the simplest model for a substitution reaction, which is a reaction in which a ÏÆ' bond between atom 1 and atom 2 is replaced by a ÏÆ' bond between atom 1 and atom 3. Substitution reactions are incredibly important in organic chemistry, and the most important of these involve substitutions at C. For example: This substitution reaction, discovered in 1849, involves the nucleophilic O making a new bond to the electrophilic C, and the bond between the electrophilic C and the leaving group I breaking. Any Brà ¸nsted base can also act as a nucleophile, and any nucleophile can also act as a Brà ¸nsted base, but some compounds are particularly good bases and particularly poor nucleophiles, whereas some are particularly poor bases and particularly good nucleophiles. Any Brà ¸nsted or Lewis acid can also act as an electrophile, but there are many electrophiles that are neither Brà ¸nsted nor Lewis acids (as in the example above). A haloalkane, e.g. CH3CH2Br, can in principle undergo either of two polar reactions when it encounters a lone pair nucleophile, e.g. MeO-. First, MeO- might replace Br- at the electrophilic C atom, forming a new C-O bond and giving an ether as the product. This is substitution, because the C-Br ÏÆ' bond is replaced with a C-O ÏÆ' bond. Second, MeO- might attack a H atom that is adjacent to the electrophilic C atom, giving MeOH, Br-, and an alkene as products. The electrons in the C-H bond move to form the Ï€ bond, and the electrons in the C-X bond leave with X-. This is elimination, because a new Ï€ bond is formed, and because the elements of the organic starting material are now divided between more tha n one product. Elimination requires that the substrate have a C-X bond and adjacent C-H bonds, while substitution requires only that the substrate have a C-X bond. Nucleophilic aromatic substitution reaction The name in the title in given to those substitution in whichnucleophilic reagent, such as Br⠁ », combine with aromatic carbon and aprecltyuviously present substituent such as †¢Cl,†¢NOâ‚‚, becomes expelled along with its bonding electrons With considerable difficultly even †¢H may be expelled with its bonding electrons i.e at H⠁ ». Biomolecular substitution reaction electron attracting substituent especially one conjugated with aromatic system such as nitro,carbonyl,syano aids the attack of the reagent and a 2-or 4-situated hetero atom ,as n pyridine ,acts in a similar way. Neuclophilic aromatic substtion can proceed by several,mechanism. The Unimolecular and Biomolecular mechanism can definitely be recognized and other mechanism some of which are understood,can be seen to exist. The unimolecular mechanism is limited to the replacement of those substituents which are sufficiently loosely bound to undergo spontaneous heterlysis in solution. The biomolecular mechanism is muc more general, doubtless because it make much less severe demands on thequality of the explled group,so that a hydrogen shift involved.

Saturday, January 18, 2020

Different Cultural Identities Dilemma Essay

The memoir Farewell to Manzanar, written by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston, tells of her experience at Manzanar internment camp after the Pacific War broke out. During the internment of Japanese-Americans, their living standards fell drastically; moreover, they faced Japanese and American values and identity conflicts. It was hard for these Japanese Americans to maintain two different cultural identities for several reasons. In the first place, they suffered from racial discrimination. In the 1940s, mainstream society and the government discriminated against Japanese Americans who were viewed as potentially dangerous people who might betray the US. Thus, Japanese Americans found it was hard to be accepted by others in America. In addition, they largely insisted on their own cultural identities. They were not willing to give up Japanese identities after arriving in America. Chinese immigrants would like to get together and formed Chinatown for the same reason. In the article, â€Å"Two wor lds, one family,† Jen Maldonado was imposed on pressure by her Taiwanese friends who insisted on Chinese culture, when she wanted to develop a cross-cultural relationship with an American. It is hard to successfully balance two different cultural identities because of racial discrimination and the adherence to people’s former culture as will be shown using evidence from Farewell to Manzanar, â€Å"Two worlds, one family† and my personal observations. In the 1940s, Japanese-Americans suffered from racial discrimination; thus, they had a hard time getting into mainstream society and balancing their cultural identities. The government never showed full trust towards these immigrants who were viewed as threats to American national security. In order to supervise Japanese-Americans and prevent any potential danger, the government relocated Japanese Americans to internment camps, which exacerbated cultural conflicts and undermined basic human rights. The racist decision that the government made led Japanese Americans to feel that they were incompatible with American culture. Because of the racial discrimination the government initialized, many Japanese immigran ts thought they were insulted, and so they struggled to accept their American identities. Some of them even wanted to get rid of American identities and went back to Japan. As a result, racial discrimination threatened their American identities. Houston and her friend Radine shared many qualities in common and became the best friends. Although they were socially equal, they were treated in completely different ways because of racism. Houston was not culturally accepted by mainstream society as Radine was. Boys were more likely to ask Radine to the dances, even though they flirted with Houston. Houston was barred from sororities, but Radine was admitted to join them. Houston said that, â€Å"Watching, I am simply emptied, and in the dream I want to cry out, because she is something I can never be†(172). Houston never stopped attempting to retain American identity; however, prejudice of her oriental characteristics obstructed her effort. She looked forward to fulfilling her American identity, but she was too helpless and powerless to challenge enormous racial discrimination, Other than prejudice against Japanese-Americans, another reason that caused people from different cultures to struggle to balance two cultural iden tities was adherence to their own culture. After arriving at the continent and staying there for years, many Japanese immigrants still considered that they were more Japanese than American. They were not willing to give up their own culture, and so they confronted cultural conflicts. A minority of people in the camps labeled members of the Japanese American Citizens League â€Å"inu† for â€Å"having helped the army arrange a peaceful and orderly evacuation†(67). â€Å"Inu† meant collaborator or informer in Japanese. The hatred towards these pro-American Japanese immigrants and disrespectful insult words revealed their strong belief in Japan and hostility towards America. To people’s surprise, the author’s father who stood up to defend the point of view that immigrants should be loyal to American government was assaulted and condemned by his peers. Although these pro-Japan immigrants had been in America for many years, they still insisted that they were more Japanese. It was the thought that some Japanese Americans were not capable of integrating into American culture and balancing two identities. Chinatown exemplified that Chinese immigrants insisted on their own culture. Chinese immigrants were viewed as a group of conservative and un-American people after they first came to America. They showed keen interests in preserving Chinese culture, but they would not adapt themselves to American society. Therefore, their refusal to give up Chinese identity led to their isolation and failure to balance two cultural identities Their adherence promoted the formation of Chinatown, a Chinese world in alien countries. In the article, â€Å"Two worlds, one family,† â€Å"Jen’s Taiwanese friends started giving her grief for dating an American.† They were strict about Chinese culture and rejected the cross-cultural marriage. Jen was also warned that she â€Å"‘needed to stick with someone from her own culture.'† By this, her friends hoped that Jen could retain her Chinese identity by narrowing down her dating range. However, many cases had proven that the cross-cultural marriage played an important role in balancing different cultura l identities. When people with different cultural backgrounds decide to form cross-cultural families, they build a bridge of cultural communication. Thus, her friends’ thoughts undermined cultural exchange. To conclude, it is hard to successfully balance two different cultural identities. Racial discrimination stopped Japanese Americans from balancing their cultural identities. In the wartime, the mainstream society held hostility towards these immigrants, and so they were isolated by the majority. Moreover, some people’s adherence to their former culture became the obstacle of integrating into American society. Chinese always struggled to have cross-cultural communications proceed effectively and successfully due to their insistence on Chinese identity. In the article, â€Å"Two worlds, one family,† Jen was hoped that she could date Chinese persons by her friends. However, their insistence seemed to be stubborn because it blocked effective communication between people from different cultural backgrounds. In order to balance two different cultural identities, people should be more lenient with newcomers and more open to new culture.

Friday, January 10, 2020

Tenure system

The term of office system provides faculty member stableness and a signifier of womb-to-tomb employment. Geting term of office gives a individual entree to certain fiscal and societal benefits. Furthermore, it gives a figure of freedoms and possibilities in the academic domain. From the start, the attitudes toward term of office were controversial. Hems et Al ( 2001 ) gnaws at the issue of term of office from two different waies. On the one manus, the writers stating that this system â€Å"harbors unproductive faculty† ( p.322 ) , while, on the other manus, they did non detect any connexion between â€Å"decreasing productiveness and term of office and even concluded that those faculty members possessing term of office were working more efficient† ( p.322 ) . Presents, the prevalent attitude towards term of office is positive because it provides more â€Å"freedom for the faculty† ( Bess, 1998, p.4 ) , through womb-to-tomb employment, which gives the possibility for professional development and inventions. At the same clip, the fright of module members going â€Å"deadwood† ( Bess, 1998, p.4 ; Hems et Al, 2001, p.322 ) and pretermiting their duties remains. Furthermore, there is a belief that term of office slows down and even restrains the procedure of academic development. Therefore, alterations are being proposed to the system such as â€Å"limited term of office at Tohoku University or alterations to the term of office policy at the University of Minnesota† ( Hems et Al, 2001, p.323 ) . Wood & A ; Johnsrud ( 2005 ) call term of office â€Å"an artefact of the values and premises of academic culture† ( p.394 ) . Harmonizing to this definition civilization of the module has a important topographic point in the procedure of acquiring term of office.Attitudes towards term of office and attacksWhile analyzing attitudes towards term of office and attacks, one should take two points of position towards civilization and socialisation in general and its topographic point in the academic society in peculiar, modernist and postmodernist point of views. Harmonizing to the modernist point of position, â€Å"an organisation ‘s civilization teaches people how to act, what to trust for, and what it means to win or fail† ( Tierney, 1997, p. 4 ) , in this instance an single adopts stable regulations, which exist in a society ( module ) . However, the postmodernist position of civilization is a â€Å"give-and-take† ( p.6 ) , one, which means that a individua l come ining a group and adopts its regulations and forms lending to the group ‘s civilization. In the domain of attitudes towards tenure the foregoing attacks shapes two different points of position. Modernist attack towards term of office is the most common one and is chiefly expressed in the manner people describe their work, for example, â€Å"the competition about the sum of working hours† or â€Å"the figure of publications one should hold in order to acquire tenure† ( Tierney, 1997, pp. 8-9 ) . On the other manus, postmodernist attitudes towards term of office can be seen through personal an involvement, which shapes the work of those willing to be granted term of office.DecisionMaking a decision for the research Tierney ( 1997 ) , understanding that the bulk of â€Å"individuals were able to subsume personal dispositions in favour of the modernist end of absorbing to the civilization to which they were being socialized† ( p.13 ) . Two chief domains define either modernist or postmodernist attitudes of the module towards term of office. The modernist attack dominates in instances where research work, which is seen through the sum of publications, is the chief standard for allowing term of office. Conversely, the postmodern sphere topographic points accent on learning. Faculty is most comfy with term of office but understands that there is room for extra alteration to the system ; nevertheless, post-tenure reappraisal has led to a figure of intense dissensions.Post-tenure reappraisalPost-tenure reappraisal is a â€Å"systematic, comprehensive procedure, separate from the one-year reappraisal, aimed specifically at measuring public presentation and/or fostering module growing and development† ( Wood & A ; Johnsrud, 2005, pp. 394-395 ) . This is one of the methods to avoid â€Å"deadwood† ( Bess, 1998, p.4 ; Hems et Al, 2001, p.322 ) module members ; the establishment must continue the highest degree of efficiency to those being given term of office. The new system of reappraisals can be efficient merely if they are conducted often. The research conducted after the â€Å"implementation of post-tenure reappraisal shows that productiveness did increase† ( Hems et Al, 2001, p.324 ) . Still, the new system is a really problematic topic and has gained negative attitudes from the academic society. The treatment of post-tenure reappraisals is concentrated on a figure of subjects: the degree of freedom which module has with the reappraisal, the impact of term of office on efficiency of module ‘s work, and those responsible for reexamining module. Foreigners conduct post-tenure reappraisals, in bend ; the module considers this as an break of their academic work, and sees this as a restriction of their academic. The type of reappraisal supported by faculty members is â€Å"peer-to-peer† ( Wood & A ; Johnsrud, 2005, p.410 ) . The negative influence of term of office is argued, and, it is stated that non tenure itself but some features of the system are more influential. The influence of post-tenure reappraisals on the full academic universe is the subject being discussed the most. These reappraisals works as limitations of the freedom of instruction, and hence, faculty members are being deprived from the chief advantage granted by the system. By and large, term of office and post-tenure reappraisals have their advantages and disadvantages, which give a topographic point for the treatment of their efficiency. Tenure, which is an old system, and is being blamed for the decrease of the module ‘s work efficiency ; those with term of office are blamed for losing productiveness and general disregard of their responsibilities. Nevertheless, term of office itself, as a system, possibly the cause of the job, at the same clip, the modernist attack towards term of office may be the ground of the system ‘s unfavorable judgment for the motive. Understanding, non the term of office system itself but some of the qualities within the system are responsible for the decreasing efficiency of academic society. Post-tenure reappraisals, though, on the one manus, are able to â€Å"remove non-performing faculty† ( Wood & A ; Johnsrud, 2005, p.413 ) and, on the other manus, it is a menace to the academic universe. Post-tenure reappraisals can be the agencies of the intervention in the educational procedure, hence, destroying the freedom of learning. While term of office provides the module with extra support benefits, post-tenure reappraisals are able to eliminate them. The inefficiency of the term of office system has led to creative activity of post-tenure reappraisals. Still, as the reappraisals have led to a het argument, alternate ways of controling those with term of office should be farther studied.MentionsBess, J. L. ( 1998, January/February ) . Contract systems, bureaucratisms, and module motive: The likely effects of a no-tenure policy. Journal of Higher Education, 69 ( 1 ) , 1-22. Helms, M. M. , Williams, A. B. , & A ; Nixon, J. C. ( 2001 ) . TQM rules and their relevancy to higher instruction: The inquiry of term of office and post-tenure. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15 ( 6/7 ) , 322-331. Wood, M. , & A ; Johnsrud, L. ( 2005, Jumping ) . Post-tenure reappraisal: What matters to faculty. Review ofHigher Education, 28 ( 3 ) , 393-420. Tierney, W. G. ( 1997, January/February ) . Organizational socialisation in higher instruction.Journal of Higher Education, 68 ( 1 ) , 1-16.

Thursday, January 2, 2020

The Growth Of Cell Phone Use - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 668 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2019/08/16 Category Technology Essay Level High school Tags: Cell Phone Essay Did you like this example? The growth of cell phone use among adults, teens, and children has grown so much so, that it has become american culture. Phones have become part of our everyday lives. Mobile phone ownership has increased tremendously. In a recent study, 95% of americans have some kind phone. And that 75% of americans have a smartphone,up from just 35% in a survey in 2011.The popularity of these devices have affected modern life in manys ways. Good and bad. Through the use of cell phones, we can do so much. From talking with someone miles away, or entertaining yourself by watching videos. But the reason that most people have cell phones is that we can keep in touch with anybody we want. Whether its your neighbor, or your great aunt who live across the country. We can communicate with anybody. There is so much more we can do with it, for example, using GPS, entertainment, music, sending pictures, etc. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Growth Of Cell Phone Use" essay for you Create order There is no doubt that these gadgets are very useful, and they do help our everyday lives. But like in most things, there are pros and cons to it. Some cons of using cell phones are that it can give you lack of sleep, put you in dangerous situations, give you health risk, a distraction from the world, and more. With about 6.8 billion people with phones, this impacts our society a lot. Making our society rely on our phones 24/7. There was clever experiment that MIT did with teen and adults. Professors made giving up smartphone for a day a requirement of the students in their courses. Most of the students, who could plan what day theyd give up their phones, felt some degree of anxiety. They didnt know what to do with the extra time, from eating breakfast to riding on public transportation. One average american checks their phone about 80 time a day. Some even 300 times. We hear a lot about screen time and how bad it is for us. But, at the end of the day, everybody needs them for their own use. What was on a desktop computer, is now in our pockets. But things still dont change, phones are still bad. What we can do, is limit our use of using our phones. There are many different approaches to reducing our use. Some people actually take a method called digital detox. Which are just a number of days of tech-free world. A device holiday if you may call it. Others download apps to limit their use. These apps limit your use by blocking access to distracting applications like games or social media. But still leave the necessary apps, and still give time to the other apps so you do have something to enjoy after a long day. But like most people, we dont want to limit ourselves that much we are bored all day. Some tips on limit ourselves are; instead of using a phone as a alarm, use an alarm clock and charge your phone somewhere else before you go to sleep. Thi s will less tempt you to check your phone at night or in the morning. Next is not check your phone at the table. This will make you more social and not look at your phone while talking to someone. And finally is that make plans in advance. Create a schedule about what your going to do and watch so you can better plan when you should study, and do your other important task. Mobile phones are a vital piece of most children and adults lives. There are certainly many flaws and cons about having one but on the other hand, there are so many benefits of having one. In conclusion there are pros in cons to having a mobile phone. Whether you use these facts to make your decision on getting one or buying a new one, is entirely up to the buyer. However you feel about these devices, they are always going to be here, and play a very prominent role in our daily lives.